- Does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez want to
- It's about higher marginal rates — not a flat rate
- Jacking up the top tax rate ly wouldn't impact you
- The economy still grew when tax rates were high
- Other developed countries have high tax rates
- A threat to the profit motive?
- A bipartisan group in Congress wants to make it harder for you to do taxes
- Why the government should just do your taxes for you
- The unholy alliance of Big Tax Prep and anti-tax conservatives
Does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez want to
Freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez backs the idea of a “Green New Deal” for the U.S.
, a plan popular in progressive policy circles under which the federal government would pour billions of dollars into renewable energy.
How would the New York Democrat help fund such a costly program? Raise taxes on the rich to their highest level since 1980, just before Ronald Reagan started hacking rates.
The top tax on the wealthy should rise to as high as 70 percent, Ocasio-Cortez told “60 Minutes” on Sunday.
That approach stands in stark contrast to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which gave the lion's share of benefits from reducing federal income tax rates to top earners and corporations. Not surprisingly, conservatives are bashing Ocasio-Cortez' ideas.
Americans for Tax Reform founder Grover Norquist wrote on Fox News that her “soaking the rich” plan is “the opening shot in a renewed war against middle class taxpayers.”
Raising the so-called marginal tax rate on the rich would mark a return to the more progressive tax structure of the 1950s and 1960s — under Presidents Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy, for instance, the rate on those in the top bracket topped 90 percent.
Here's what you should know about Ocasio-Cortez's plan and how higher tax rates would work.
It's about higher marginal rates — not a flat rate
Rep. Steve Scalise, R.-Louisiana, tweeted that Ocasio-Cortez's approach would lead to the government taking away “70% of your income.” Yet that comment misleadingly suggests that every dollar earned by taxpayers would be docked at a flat 70 percent — that isn't what Ocasio-Cortez is proposing.
Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money
Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy programs https://t.co/NxJPSCqvrt
— Steve Scalise (@SteveScalise) January 5, 2019
Her plan focuses on marginal tax rates, a progressive tax system that's the basis of the U.S. tax code. It works by taxing the lowest amount of income at the lowest tax rate, and then increasing it gradually as a person's income rises. The goal is to tax lower earners at lower rates, while assessing higher rates on wealthier Americans.
Sometimes lost in the criticism of Ocasio-Cortez' plan is the fact that higher marginal rates are paid only on each dollar earned above a particular tax bracket. For instance, single Americans now pay at a rate of 10 percent on earnings up to $9,525, while any earnings between $9,526 and $38,700 are taxed at 12 percent.
Currently, the top rate for single taxpayers kicks in at 37 percent for every dollar earned over $500,000 in annual income.
Jacking up the top tax rate ly wouldn't impact you
Ocasio-Cortez doesn't favor imposing a 70 percent tax on the merely rich. Rather, that rate would be for people with annual income of at least $10 million or so. That's why it's not ly to hit your wallet — only the top 0.
1 percent of income earners are ly to come close to that, as this group enjoys average adjusted gross income of $7.3 million.
And only 140,000 tax filers make this much money, compared with nearly 70 million who make up the bottom 50 percent of earners.
The economy still grew when tax rates were high
The U.S. economy boomed in the '50s and '60s when, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the top rate ranged between 70 percent and 92 percent.
Of course, no time periods in economic history are directly comparable.
In the post-World War II era, for instance, the baby boom drove massive spending on the housing market and productivity was much higher than it is today.
But the point is that higher top marginal tax rates don't appear to cause lower economic growth.
Other developed countries have high tax rates
Several advanced economies around the world have top tax rates approaching what Ocasio-Cortez favors, and by many measures they enjoy higher standards of living than the U.S.
“What we have in mind … and my policies most closely resemble what we see in the U.K., in Norway, in Finland, in Sweden,” she told “60 Minutes.”
Sweden has a top rate of 70 percent, Matt Bruenig, founder of People's Policy Project, a left-leaning advocacy group wrote in Jacobin magazine. Sweden is ranked No. 11 by the Social Progress Imperative, which looks at the capacity for a country to meet “basic human needs.” The U.S. ranks No. 25, just below Portugal.
A threat to the profit motive?
Ocasio-Cortez's plan echoes findings by economists including Nobel laureate Peter Diamond and Berkeley professor Emmanuel Saez, who estimated that the ideal marginal tax rate should be 73 percent.
Most other economists (including many conservative and pro-business experts) agree that a fair and productive society includes some form of progressive tax system, even if they vary in their calculations of what that should be.
But what about the argument that high tax rates dissuade people from working? After all, if Uncle Sam is going to take most of your income, why bother working at all? But that may be looking at the wrong question. Higher taxes on every dollar earned above $10 million isn't ly to lower multimillionaires' drive to remain rich (though it could arguably encourage them to seek ways to avoid taxes).
Is Ocasio-Cortez afraid of making enemies? 04:29
Perhaps a more relevant question: Whether the tax system could encourage people to enter lower-paying yet socially useful jobs, such as teaching or scientific research.
One study found that a “radical” policy of imposing taxes according to professions — such as providing tax breaks to teachers while imposing higher taxes on hedge fund managers — “could grow the economy dramatically,” its authors wrote in the Harvard Business Review.
Ocasio-Cortez didn't address such ideas, but her goal in taxing the extremely rich at higher levels is to guarantee a job for every American at a fair wage. “When you can't provide for your kids working a full-time job, working two full-time jobs. When you can't have health care. That is not — that is not dignified,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
A bipartisan group in Congress wants to make it harder for you to do taxes
Only one day left to stop Congress from deliberately screwing you over. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Congress is set to make it illegal for the IRS to create free tax preparation software, software that could save millions of Americans from wasting their money on TurboTax, H&R Block, and other tax preparers currently profiting from the IRS’s failure to help taxpayers.
ProPublica’s Justin Elliott reported that the Taxpayer First Act, sponsored in the House by Democratic Rep. John Lewis (GA) and Republican Mike Kelly (PA), and in the Senate by Finance Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), would prohibit the IRS from creating an online tax preparation system that would compete with TurboTax and H&R Block.
(UPDATE: After this post was published, Senate finance ranking member Ron Wyden’s office pushed back on Elliott’s report, saying they’d received confirmation from the IRS chief tax counsel that the bill as written does not bar the IRS from designing their own direct filing product, if they give 12 months’ notice. It’s ly the tax prep industry would challenge the IRS if it tried to do that.)
As Elliott explained, this provision is a long-held priority of those tax preparers, who have spent massive sums of money ($6.6 million just last year) lobbying Congress to keep taxes complicated and prevent the IRS from simplifying the process.
The IRS could prepare taxes automatically for the vast majority of Americans for whom it has all the required information. The bill, Elliott reports, would bar the IRS from the much more moderate step of creating software that competes with TurboTax.
The bill, with its truly Orwellian name, passed the House Ways and Means Committee on a bipartisan basis on April 2. The committee chair, Richard Neal (D-MA), said in a statement that the bill will “protect low- and moderate-income taxpayers.”
There are some signs of opposition as the bill goes to the full House for passage. Dan Riffle, policy director for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), correctly identified the bill as a massive giveaway to the tax preparation industry:
But barring a larger movement to kill or amend the bill, the provision is headed for passage.
It should not pass. It is a huge scandal that Congress has not yet instructed the IRS to automatically prepare taxes for the vast majority of Americans. The IRS has all the information required to do that for all but a few taxpayers, and the main reason it hasn’t to date is lobbying by companies TurboTax and H&R Block.
Banning, or even discouraging, the IRS from offering an equivalent product to those companies for free would hurt consumers, provide no social value, and purely serve to increase ill-gotten rents for two of the most pointless companies currently involved in American capitalism. There is no excuse for Congress passing this provision.
Why the government should just do your taxes for you
In a way, creating a free online tax preparation program, as this bill would ban the IRS from doing, is the absolute least the federal government should be doing for you. There is little preventing the IRS from preparing tax returns on its own for most Americans.
The actual work of doing your taxes mostly involves rifling through various IRS forms you get in the mail: W-2s listing your wages, 1099s with miscellaneous income from contract work or one-off gigs, and so on. To fill out your 1040, you gather all these together and copy the numbers in them onto the 1040 form. The main advantage of TurboTax is that it can import these forms automatically and spare you this step.
But here’s the thing about the forms: The IRS gets them too. When Vox Media sent me a W-2 telling me how much it paid me in 2017, it also sent an identical one to the IRS.
When my bank sent me a 1099 telling me how much interest I earned on my savings account in 2017, it also sent one to the IRS.
If I’m not itemizing deductions ( 70 percent of taxpayers), the IRS has all the information it needs to calculate my taxes, send me a filled-out return, and let me either send it in or do my taxes by hand if I prefer.
This isn’t a purely hypothetical proposal. Countries Denmark, Sweden, Estonia, Chile, and Spain already offer “pre-populated returns” to their citizens.
The United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan have exact enough tax withholding procedures that most people don’t have to file income tax returns at all, whether pre-populated or not.
California has a voluntary return-free filing program called ReadyReturn for its income taxes.
And there are serious plans for adopting this idea nationwide.
Austan Goolsbee, former chief economist for the Obama administration, designed a proposal called “The Simple Return” in 2006 that would provide pre-populated returns for everyone not itemizing their deductions.
You could even conceivably extend it to many itemizers; mortgage lenders already send out 1098 tax forms listing interest paid over the year, and the IRS could mandate that charities do the same for tax-exempt contributions.
The Obama administration supported return-free filing, and Ronald Reagan touted the idea in a 1985 speech:
We envision a system where more than half of us would not even have to fill out a return. We call it the return-free system, and it would be totally voluntary.
If you decided to participate, you would automatically receive your refund or a letter explaining any additional tax you owe. Should you disagree with this figure, you would be free to fill out your taxes using the regular form.
We believe most Americans would go from the long form or the short form to no form.
The proposal would be particularly good for low-income Americans eligible for the earned income and child tax credits, which are both refundable and offer substantial benefits to low-income taxpayers who file. But because you have to file, compliance isn’t perfect.
Twenty percent of people eligible for the EITC don’t get it, and a big fraction of returns contain errors, usually because of the complexity of the credit and due to errors by commercial tax preparers.
Automatic filing would provide EITC payments to many of that 20 percent not getting them, and would spare taxpayers from doing complex calculations that sometimes lead to errors.
The unholy alliance of Big Tax Prep and anti-tax conservatives
Grover Norquist wants your taxes to be complicated.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
So why hasn’t return-free filing happened yet? Well, as the current fight in Congress suggests, the short answer is lobbying, and in particular lobbying by companies Intuit.
In 2013, ProPublica’s Liz Day wrote an incredible exposé on just how hard Intuit has lobbied to stop return-free filing from becoming a reality:[In 2007] a bill to limit return-free filing was introduced by a pair of unly allies: Reps. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the conservative House majority leader, and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a liberal stalwart whose district includes Silicon Valley.
Intuit’s political committee and employees have contributed to both. Cantor and his leadership PAC have received $26,100 in the past five years from the company’s PAC and employees. In the last two years, the Intuit PAC and employees donated $26,000 to Lofgren.
… In 2005, California launched a pilot program called ReadyReturn. As it fought against the program over the next five years, Intuit spent more than $3 million on overall lobbying and political campaigns in the state, according to Dennis J. Ventry Jr., a professor at UC Davis School of Law who specializes in tax policy and legal ethics.
In this, Intuit and other tax prep companies had a powerful ally: Grover Norquist.
The anti-tax crusader vehemently opposes automatic filing on the grounds that it makes tax season insufficiently nightmarish, which might reduce people’s aversion to taxes and make it easier for politicians to pass tax increases. So even though Reagan himself supported automatic filing, Norquist has helped make the idea dirt in the eyes of conservative legislators.
Instead of automatic filing, the tax prep industry has championed the Free Filing Alliance, a program through which companies Intuit (which owns TurboTax) and H&R Block offer free software to low-income taxpayers. But as Elliott explains, this offer is basically a bad joke that few taxpayers use:
The Free File Alliance, a private industry group, says 70% of American taxpayers are eligible to file for free. Those taxpayers, who must make less than $66,000, have access to free tax software provided by the companies. But just 3% of eligible U.S.
taxpayers actually use the free program each year.
Critics of the program say that companies use it as a cross-marketing tool to upsell paid products, that they have deliberately underpromoted the free option and that it leaves consumer data open to privacy breaches.
Tax preparation is not something the government needs private sector assistance with. It’s, by its nature, an entirely public sector activity. Congress should ideally pass automatic filing legislation that puts H&R Block and Intuit’s tax division business.
But until that happens, preventing a ban on an IRS filing program is the absolute least Congress can do.
“,”author”:”Dylan Matthews”,”date_published”:”2019-04-09T14:40:00.000Z”,”lead_image_url”:”https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/U4iQK2HvMyg3__v92D_-0Ohq1X0=/0x0:3000×1571/fit-in/1200×630/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/16018612/947094492.jpg.jpg”,”dek”:null,”next_page_url”:null,”url”:”https://www.vox.com/2019/4/9/18301943/last-minute-tax-preparation-h-r-block-turbotax”,”domain”:”www.vox.com”,”excerpt”:”Congress is set to pass one of the most blatant pieces of corporate welfare in years.”,”word_count”:1522,”direction”:”ltr”,”total_pages”:1,”rendered_pages”:1}